The Weekly Wrap: July 19-25

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
vintage gifts with candle and radio background
Photo by betül nur akyürek on Pexels.com

The Weekly Wrap: July 19-25

Goodness in Literature

I finished and reviewed Theo of Golden this week and I understand what makes this such an exceptional book. It is more than just a “feel good” novel. Rather, it is a novel that quietly invites us to explore whether it is possible to live in our heartless and heartbreaking time without becoming self-protective or cynical. Theo opens himself to others to notice and name the exemplary qualities in their lives. He is genuinely kind, self-effacing, and generous. He knows deep sadness, yet lives joyfully and in the hope of heaven.

Literature often explores the darkness of the human heart. And this is not absent in Allen Levi’s book. But most writers find it easier to write about us at our worst than the possibilities of a different kind of life. That’s what Levi does. Not only that, he challenges us to ask whether our current fraught cultural story is the only one in which to live.

The Bruderhof use a motto or tagline of “another life is possible.” That’s what Levi show us. Or rather, he invites us to find ourselves in a different story. It’s rare that books do this in such a powerful way in my experience. I think it is what makes the Lord of the Rings compelling for so many of us. We not merely want to go to Middle Earth, but to bring something of its goodness here.

For me, the biblical story is one of those compelling stories of a God who wants to display his glory and love through his people, as wayward as they are. He even enters the story as one of us, exchanges his goodness for our evil, and through resurrection makes new life and a renewed creation possible. I’ve spent my life living in and into that story. Sadly, many who call themselves God’s people choose to live in our fraught cultural story, instead.

We need such stories, I believe. What stories have been compelling to you in their goodness?

Five Articles Worth Reading

Walking into my bookstore can be overwhelming. Sure, I like to browse for those serendipitous finds. But sometimes it helps to have an idea of what others think worthwhile of the many new books. published. And that’s what The New York Times has done in “The Best Books of the Year (So Far).” I like it because it is not overwhelming.

About ten years ago Amitav Ghosh argued that climate change required a new kind of novel. In “The Crisis That Novelists Can’t Handle,” Robert Rubsam reviews Ghosh’s Ghost Eye and assesses whether Ghosh lived up to his own critique.

Using Percival Everett’s James, Geoffrey Mak explores in “Misreading the Past to Chart the Future” the genre of “remake literature” and what is involved in literary remakes.

This month’s Atlantic’s cover story is “The End of Reading Is Here.” In Trevor Aleo’s “Three Theses On the Literacy Crisis” he offers a rejoinder to Rose Horowitch’s article.

Lastly, birthright citizenship has been much in the news in recent years, particularly with the Supreme Court’s decision upholding it. Richard A. Greenwald, in “Birthright and Belonging,” digs deeper into the political economy that has led to challenges to the traditional American creed.

Quote of the Week

Emma Lazarus was born on July 22, 1849. Her poem “The New Colossus” was written in 1887 to raise money for the Statue of Liberty and is inscribed on its pedestal. I thought it worthy as an example of our American creed to reproduce it here in full:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Miscellaneous Musings

Believe it or not, my mail has include a couple of Advent books already. Advent in July! I will be featuring them on my social media and reviewing them well before Advent. I appreciate that lead time from publishers.

In writing this post I discovered that The New York Times has joined The Atlantic in allowing subscribers to share unlimited articles from behind their paywall. Previously they allowed ten a month. I’ve made the case that this is both a great benefit to subscribers and very cheap advertising for their product. I hope you will enjoy the articles as well as subscribe if you like them and as finances permit.

I don’t review many books for middle school/high school readers but I’ve been enjoying Don Everts Oscar and the Mystery of the Glowing Orbs which talks about the challenges of moving to a new city during school as well as dealing with a disability.

Next Week’s Reviews

Monday: Richard Hughes Gibson, The Way of Dante

Tuesday: Richard B. Hayes, The Moral Vision of the New Testament

Wednesday: Laurel Richardson, Falling Into a Good Life

Thursday: John Green, Everything is Tuberculosis

Friday: Ellis Peters, A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs

So, that’s The Weekly Wrap for July 19-25.

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.

Review: Persuasion

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image of "Persuasion" by Jane Austen

Persuasion

Persuasion, Jane Austen. Penguin Classics (ISBN: 9780141439686) 2003, first published 1817.

Summary: Will Anne Elliot retrieve the missed opportunity of a broken engagement with Captain Wentworth eight years later?

The plotline of this story was set up in its first pages. Anne Elliot, youngest daughter of Baronet Walter Elliot of Kellynch Hall becomes engaged to an ambitious young naval officer, Captain Frederick Wentworth. But those around her do not consider him worthy of a Baronet’s daughter by either measures of class or wealth, of which he has little. Although her father and oldest sister Elizabeth disapprove, Lady Russell is most persuasive. She is a distant relative who has become Anne’s closest confidant since the death of her mother. Because of her disapproval, Anne breaks off the engagement, against the inclinations of her heart.

Eight years pass. In the intervening period, Sir Walter, with no Lady Elliot to check him overspends his means. To pay off debts and reduce expenses, the family decides to rent Kellynch Hall and move to Bath. Bath offers a social circle enticing to both Lord Elliot and Elizabeth. Anne prefers her old neighborhood but has no choice. Then she learns that the new tenants are Admiral Croft and his wife Sophia. Sophia is Captain Wentworth’s sister!

Anne is able to stay nearby with her sister Mary’s family which include her husband Charles and sisters Henrietta and Louisa. Then Captain Wentworth returns for a visit with her sister. In the intervening years, he has made a fortune and is ready to marry and settle down. He’s formally courteous, and in some instances seems attentive. But Anne, the girl in her full bloom of beauty at nineteen is somewhat faded and worn at twenty-seven. And Wentworth seems attracted to Louisa, who returns his interest.

During a visit to the seaside resort of Lyme Regis, Louisa suffers severe injuries while “daring” the Captain to catch her. Anne offers to stay but both Mary and the Captain stay instead, although Anne would have been the better nurse. Anne rejoins her family in Bath, and expects to hear both news of Louisa’s recovery and her engagement to Wentworth.

Meanwhile an Elliot cousin, heir to Kellynch Hall reconciles with Sir Walter after an estrangement of many years. He sets his sights on Anne, who does not trust him, despite the efforts of other family members to persuade her this is a good match. Then startling news come. Louisa is engaged, but to another naval officer. And Wentworth is in Bath, but remains aloof, seeing Elliot’s attentions.

I found myself thinking throughout this novel that if Anne and Wentworth could have fifteen minutes alone, they could sort things out! But then what would happen to the romantic and dramatic tension?

There is the great irony in Sir Walter’s social pretensions and the reality of his straitened circumstances, requiring him to rent Kellynch Hall to (ugh!) a naval officer, and brother-in-law of Captain Wentworth.

Finally, there are a number of “persuasions” in the story–of Lady Russell, of Cousin Elliot with Sir Walter, of Mrs. Clay, who has insinuated herself into the family circle, and of the family with Cousin Elliot. All of these go against the wisdom of the heart and we hope that the Anne of twenty-seven will be wiser than the girl of nineteen.

This was Austen’s last novel, published posthumously. I like the process of maturing in Anne but thought other characters like Elizabeth or even Lady Russell lacked substance. The interest of Anne and Wentworth seemed obvious enough to this reader that the plotting just drew out the obvious while seeming to leave things up in the air. I didn’t think it Austen at her best.

Review: Theo of Golden

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image of "Theo of Golden" by Allen Levi

Theo of Golden

Theo of Golden, Allen Levi. Atria Books (ISBN: 9781668236512) 2025.

Summary: An old man moves to Golden, sees portraits in a coffee shop and in powerful personal encounters gives them to their owners.

I think I’m a latecomer to the Theo of Golden party. For months everyone who has read this book, including friends with discriminating book judgment, have raved about this book. Truthfully, I feared buying the book and being disappointed. Instead, I was won over from his first portrait bestowal to Minnette. For those who haven’t yet read, the story in brief is this:

An old man, Theo moves from New York City to the southern town of Golden to look after his properties. On visiting the local coffee shop, he notices the pencil-drawn portraits of local residents. He conceives the plan to give them to their proper owners. He purchases them, works with Mrs. Gidley, the administrator for James Ponder, whose vacant apartment he has rented, to contact each with a personal note. In it he invites them to meet him at a particular bench by a fountain known as the Fedder..

Along the way, he becomes deeper friends with some of the residents. James Ponder becomes not only advisor but friend and confidant. Others include Tony, a Vietnam vet bookstore owner, a little girl, Lamisha, with extensive injuries from a car crash, an eccentric, homeless cyclist, Ellen and a gifted young cellist, Simone. Then there is his deepening friendship with the artist of the portraits, Asher Glissen.

I won’t go further than that in the plot except to note we know little of Theo’s background except that he grew up in Portugal, lost a daughter, and obviously is a man of great means. What we do learn, and what makes this book so compelling is the humble and beautiful character of Theo.

What most seems to stand out is how fully present he is to each person he meets. Instead of talking about himself, he listens to and draws out stories, making people feel safe with him. Theo even wins the trust of Ellen, the eccentric homeless woman, with whom he eventually goes on a bike adventure, something no one has ever done. He notices and names. He studies each portrait and then speaks of what he sees in that person from what they’ve said and what he sees. Then he gently invites them to live into what he has named.

He loved beauty and joy. Whether it was evening reveries by the Oxbow River, delight in a street musician, or enjoyment of a rare bottle of port with his bookstore friend on that man’s birthday, he had a great capacity to take joy in beauty. We learn that giving away portraits in Golden has been the happiest time of his life.

Yet he was a man who knew deep sadness in a romance broken off, and the death of his daughter. One of the most profound passages, in which he names a gift of the artist, Asher Glissen is about sadness. He has just observed that he sees sadness in every portrait of Glissen’s.

“It is a very high compliment, young man. A very high compliment indeed. Perhaps I am mistaken but, at some point, if we are wise, we must all confront our sadness, our brokenness, our disappointment. I am quite certain that your portraits help some people in a very tender and courteous way, to ask themselves, maybe for the first time, ‘Who is that person? What do I know to be true, really true, about that face?…Asher, we are masters at masking our sadness, but deep down inside, if we are honest, we know that there is an unsatisfied longing deep inside all of us. Your portraits invite people to be alone and quiet and truthful with themselves, to admit the longing and to discover the goodness in their sadness. Maybe?”

Asher is also one who notices and names through his portraits.

Finally, Theo is a man of deep faith. While Tony, the bookstore owner scoffs at the idea, Theo quietly hopes in heaven. This vision of heaven is evident in the Christmas gifts he gives. He invites Simone, the cellist, to play for the angels. He calls the little girl, Lamisha, a daughter of the King. And he writes to Asher,

“It is an imponderable thought that the Giver of Faces, the face of heaven itself, the face for which every heart yearns, became a wee babe, misty-eyed and helpless, looking Himself for the tender face of his mother on the night of the angels.”

I understand why this book has touched the hearts of many. We are confronted with heartlessness in our media every day. Levi’s book speaks to a yearning in us that believes “another life is possible” as my friends in the Bruderhof describe it. Theo embodies that life. His presence paints a picture of the Christ-transformed life. He incarnates the deep humility, gentleness, generosity, playfulness, and compassion of the Lord of heaven. And quietly, Theo of Golden invites us into that same kind of life.

Review: Words that Shape Us

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Words that Shape Us" by Ken Waters

Words that Shape Us

Words that Shape Us, Ken Waters, foreword by John Ferré. Integratio Press (ISBN: 9781959685296) 2025.

Summary: A comparative analysis of four evangelical periodicals coverage of American politics and faith from 2016 to 2024.

One of the least controversial things that may be said of our current president is that he has dominated the American political scene from 2016 to the present. Surprisingly, despite questions of character and ethics, he has enjoyed broad support among whites who identify as evangelical Christians. At the same time, there is a dissenting minority, often characterized as an evangelical elite, in terms of education, who hold differing political views. A number of commentators have sought to parse the current landscape of evangelicalism. In this book, Ken Waters, a emeritus professor of journalism at Pepperdine University approaches this cultural analysis through the lens of four of the leading evangelical publications of this time period. Specifically, he compares their coverage and editorial slant on key political events during this period.

In his Introduction, he identifies three questions he will explore. Firstly, how does the divide in voting advice in the evangelical press in 2016 carry through in the voting behavior of evangelicals then and subsequently? Secondly, what can we learn about the evangelical movement by a broader look at how they discuss how Christians ought live in the modern. Thirdly, what might these findings foreshadow for the future of the evangelical movement? In particular, do the divergences reflected in these publications reflect a fraying or disintegrating movement?

Then Waters introduces each of the publications, offering a brief historical sketch. In alphabetical order, he begins with The Christian Post, a free, online-only publication featuring daily news coverage, launched by Korean pastor, David Jang in 2006. Richard Land signed on as executive editor. Second is Christianity Today, launched out of the vision of Billy Graham in 1956 as a counterpoint to The Christian Century. It sought to articulate thoughtful evangelical faith and positions on moral issues including abortion and homosexuality.

Sojourners (originally The Post-American) was formed in 1971 by disaffected evangelical seminary students as a peace and justice-oriented magazine, a distinctive that has only expanded in recent years. Led by founder Jim Wallis, it is a mouthpiece of a progressive evangelicalism. Finally. World was founded in 1986 by Joel Belz with a self-described editorial philosophy of “biblical journalism.” It underwent a profound shift in 2021 when Albert Mohler became Opinion editor, accepting only conservative commentary. Many of the journalists, including Marvin Olasky left the publication.

In the remaining chapters, Waters analyzes each periodical’s coverage and editorial approach to major political issues. He begins with the 2016 election and the approach to each of the candidates. The Christian Post included opinions supporting each candidate while the publication did not want to give a vote to either. They reluctantly deemed Trump the lesser of two evils. Christianity Today likewise criticized both candidates, Clinton on positions and Trump on moral grounds and did not endorse a candidate. Sojourners rarely mentioned Clinton, apart from her lifelong social justice Methodist background. However, it extensively criticized candidate Trump. While not endorsing either, it made clear Trump was anathema. World was hard-hitting both in allegations of corruption in Clinton’s background while calling on Trump to step aside for another candidate. It endorsed neither candidate while acknowledging that most readers would support Trump. Evangelicals followed this pattern in the next three presidential elections.

Succeeding chapters used the same approach to analyze the coverage of immigration, nationalism, George Floyd and racism, COVID, the 2020 election and Joe Biden, the end of Roe, LGBTQ+ questions, and the 2024 election. The Christian Post and World, especially after 2021, trended more conservative while Christianity Today and Sojourners trended more progressive. What was most striking to Waters was that the Christian perspective presented in all of the publications tended to differ markedly from opinion polls measuring evangelical belief. In the case of the murder of George Floyd, Christianity Today determined its past reporting on race to be deficient and the publication took steps to address those deficiencies.

Most striking were Waters’ conclusions about the future of evangelicalism. He notes the possibilities for fragmentation, particularly along the lines of an educational divide. Demographics are rapidly altering both the makeup of evangelicalism and the media landscape. However, quoting Russell Moore, he believes the shakeup and “homelessness” of evangelicals is a precursor to renewal. And he concludes that the “words that shape us” will continue to be important in that renewal.

Waters offers us an outstanding work of both media and cultural analysis. He read hundreds of articles from the represented publications during this period. However, I question how influential these publications have been in forming an evangelical political philosophy, except among more educated evangelicals. Even here, did they form it or just mirror it? Are other media outlets on the left and right far more “shaping”? I think that many of evangelical conviction are turning from such outlets to others like Plough, Mere Orthodoxy, and Comment. None of these are mentioned here. I do think words are shaping. But, while important to the analysis of this work, I question whether the four publications studied here are the wineskins that will shape the hoped-for renewal. If the Lord is pleased to pour out new wine, new wineskins will be needed.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: The Earth Will Be Filled

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "The Earth Will Be Filled: by Donnie Berry

The Earth Will Be Filled

The Earth Will Be Filled, (Essential Studies in Biblical Theology), Donnie Berry. IVP Academic (ISBN: 9781514010778) 2025.

Summary: The glory of God in scripture, that God reveals his glory to his people and through them, to fill the earth.

The glory of God is the bedrock of scripture. So maintains Donnie Berry who finds the glory of God wherever he turns in scripture. But what do we mean by the glory of God? Berry studies the words used and proposes this definition;

“Glory refers to all the fullness of the triune God–the fullness of his wisdom, love, creativity, beauty, strength, compassion, justice, life, joy–all that makes him weighty and wonderful, made manifest for us to see, experience, respond to, and, perhaps most surprisingly, participate in” (p. 7).

Berry argues that this is a worthwhile study. God made and redeemed us for Himself and to long for and behold God’s glory is the bedrock of joy in our lives. So what is the witness of scripture to God’s glory? Like other volumes in this series, Berry will trace the theme of glory from Genesis to Revelation. In the process he will formulate a biblical theology of the glory of God.

The narrative begins with creation. God fills the earth with the glory shared with God’s triune self. Not only that but God crowns humans with the special glory of dominion, bringing God’s goodness to all creation. But as a result of disobedience, humans cease to glorify God and spread his glory to all creation. Instead, they spread destruction and death. But even then, God clothes them and spares Noah and his creatures.

But God does not give up on his plan to spread his glory through his people. Beginning with Abraham, he calls out a people through whom he will bless the earth. He reveals that glory through Israel in the exodus and at Sinai. When they rebel, Moses not only pleads for God to go with them but asks to see God’s glory. God cannot do this. It would kill Moses. But he makes all his goodness pass before him. Moses sees what is glorious about God. Then he discloses Israel’s purpose–they are God’s treasured possession and a kingdom of priests. Furthermore, God makes his glory dwell among them through giving them both Torah and tabernacle. Eventually, the temple will replace the tabernacle at the height of Solomon’s rule. God’s glory will descend upon it.

Yet Israel, like Adam will rebel. The nation will fall and the glory will depart from the temple. But God doesn’t give up. God is present and preserves them through exile. Then he promises that his glory will not only return to Zion but fill the earth. Key to this will be “the servant of the Lord.”

Then John tells us “the Word became flesh” and glory came down among us. Signs of that glory fill the first part of John’s gospel. Then the hour of his glory comes when he is lifted up on the cross to draw all people unto him. God raises him and and he imparts the Spirit of glory, empowering his disciples for mission.

Paul, in Romans, speaks of our hope of sharing in God’s glory as God restore all creation. This is hope for both Jew and Greek, for all who hear God’s “no condemnation.” God’s glory in Christ extends to this redeemed humanity, and through them to the groaning creation.

Finally, in Revelation, we witness the final victory of God’s glory, centering on the slain Lamb, who is worthy of all praise. Though him, God brings all earth under his rule. And in the new creation, his people share his glory and rule.

How then shall we respond? The invitation is to behold, and by beholding, God transforms us from one degree of glory to another. Whereas our enemy subjects us to slavery, our redeeming Lord both reveals and shares his glory with us.

I wish Berry could have discussed the Synoptic gospels and Acts, and the witness of Hebrews, which would have enriched this study. However, there are plenty of riches in this “story of glory.” In addition, Berry uses various iterations of a very clear diagram to show the unfolding story. I felt Berry wrote in such a way as to not merely inform but to invite us to behold God’s glory and be transformed. This is biblical theology at its best.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Moms on the Way

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Moms on the Way" by Kathy Tuan-Maclean and Tara Edelschick

Moms on the Way

Moms on the Way (IVP Bible Study Experience), Kathy Tuan-Maclean and Tara Edelschick. IVP Bible Studies (ISBN: 9781514014202) 2026

Summary: A seven week Bible study for groups with personal readings on following Jesus through the challenges of motherhood.

Being a mom can be challenging. Kathy Tuan-Maclean and Tara Edelschick know this from their own experience as moms. Then they talked to seven hundred other moms to learn about the challenges they faced. In 2024, drawing on this research, they published their first group study book, Moms at the Well, to begin to address facing those challenges by finding nourishment in Christ and in community with other moms. But their research raised more issues than they could cover in just one book, so they’ve returned with a sequel.

In Moms on the Way, they address seven more topics through scripture-based discussions in groups coupled with five days of personal readings and study that amplify the group discussion. The topics are:

  • When we need a friend
  • When we feel ashamed
  • When we feel resentful
  • When we feel like we don’t have enough
  • When we’re caught up in the rat race
  • When God invites us to embrace vulnerability
  • When all we can taste is bitterness

Each week’s group discussions begin with text introductions and opening activities and a short video clip [QR code in guide to access]. They follow by Bible study with questions to engage and apply the text. Then they conclude with a breath prayer, a “Holy Spirit check-in” to listen for what the Spirit is saying, and a written leader benediction. The studies ideally take about 90 minutes but leaders can adapt them for shorter periods, like a lunch hour.

The five personal studies look at smaller segments of the passage or related passages combining biblical study, reflection questions, prayer prompts and invitations. The guide allows for plenty of room to write in responses.

While I’m not a mom, there are several things I like about this guide. Firstly, shaming is out! Moms struggle with this enough and the authors create a shame-free space where people can be honest about everything from how little of the guide they were able to read to struggles with loneliness, resentment, competition with other moms, and even bitterness. They even address shame and how God beckons us to break the cycle of shame with a cycle of spiritual transformation.

Secondly, Tara and Kathy are real! They share honestly and vulnerably about their own struggles, some continuing, and how they are leaning into their faith. For example, Kathy writes about her bitterness when diagnosed with chronic kidney disease in her twenties and Tara when God felt absent to her when she was grieving her father’s death.

Finally, women in narratives often don’t have names. In several narratives, the authors give them names that make contextual sense. The mother of the groom at the wedding feast at Cana is Yedida. The woman Elijah stays with at Zarephath becomes Zerah. Finally, the Shunamite whose son Elisha raises is becomes Shona. Such names foreground and make characters real, often women, who reside in the background of scripture.

While the guide can be studied individually, the authors believe the communal experience of honest sharing and mutual learning is immeasurably enriching. If you are part of a mom’s group looking for a study discussion guide that takes you deeply into scripture as well as into honest sharing and reflection, this is an outstanding resource.

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

My review of Moms at the Well appears here: https://bobonbooks.com/2024/04/30/review-moms-at-the-well/

The Weekly Wrap: July 12-18

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
vintage gifts with candle and radio background
Photo by betül nur akyürek on Pexels.com

The Weekly Wrap: July 12-18

Smoke Days

As a reader, one of my delights has always been in snow days, when blizzards and cold make staying inside and reading. In our brave new climate world, snow days are increasingly infrequent. But this week delivered the new climatological replacement: the Smoke Day. In our part of the United States, if Canada is having a wildfire season and the winds are out of the northwest, the smoke, smelling like burning plastic, fills our skies. Yesterday morning, our Air Quality Index reached over 400, the worst reading our city has ever recorded. Some cities to our north reached readings of over 700, hazardous for all mammals.

Now I don’t think this is a good thing. Firstly, it is just plain dangerous. Sunlight turns the smoke into deadly things like benzene, formaldehyde, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and ozone, some of which are carcinogenic and others which just make breathing difficult. In addition PM 2.5 particulates penetrate deep into our lungs. Then there is all that carbon dioxide, added to what we humans generate. We never used to have days like this. Changing climate conditions turn Canadian forests into tinderboxes. And many Canadians are dealing with far more dire conditions than we are.

The one consolation is that like the Snow Day, about all one can do is stay indoors (hopefully in an air-conditioned spot that filters and recycles the air) and enjoy a good book. But I manage to do that most days anyway. At least I have a good excuse to not do yard work! I would rather not have the excuse of Smoke Days. But I fear it is a new normal. Stay safe friends!

Five Articles Worth Reading

Everyone’s abuzz about Christopher Nolan’s new cinematic rendering of The Odyssey. In “We’ll Help You Find Your Next Great Book. (Spoiler: It’s the ‘Odyssey.’),” A.O. Scott suggests that no matter your taste in literature, there is something in The Odyssey for you. And he uses that to introduce us to several translations of Homer’s classic.

Colson Whitehead’s Cool Machine concludes his Harlem Trilogy. David Hadju reviews it in “The Unapologetic Crime Fiction of Colson Whitehead.”

Batsheva Labowe-Stoll maintains the quest to develop artificial intelligence has often been religious in nature in “The Deep Spiritual History of AI.” For those familiar with Genesis, the efforts to develop AI have often seemed to me another Tower of Babel story.

Derek Thompson asks, “Why is the news media so interested in telling you how much the world sucks all the time? Why are so many of us obsessed with distraction and managing our attention? Why is it so hard to stop comparing ourselves to others? And why does everything in art and design seem the same these days?” In conversation with philosopher Agnes Callard, Thompson discovers one idea that links these questions, the “uni-context.” Read “A Philosopher’s One-Word Theory to Explain Why the World Feels So Weird” for the full interview.

Finally, I’ve often reflected on what an amazing intellectual Christian community the Inklings represented. Comment explores similar communities through history and around the world in “Seedbeds of Christian Humanism: A Gallery” The article links to articles devoted to 31 different communities.

Quote of the Week

This one was thought provoking. Is the search for truth a waking up from our dreams? So suggests Iris Murdoch, born July 15, 1919:

“We live in a fantasy world, a world of illusion. The great task in life is to find reality.”

Miscellaneous Musings

An example of the community the Inklings and Dorothy L. Sayers enjoyed is described in a new book, The Way of Dante by Richard Hughes Gibson. It’s a marvelous study of the interactions between C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Dorothy L. Sayers around a shared love of Dante. Not only did they challenge each other’s thinking but the encouragement of Williams and Lewis gave Sayers the courage to embark on a new translation of the Divine Comedy.

As seems usual with Jane Austen, I’m on tenterhooks to see if Anne Eliot and Captain Wentworth rekindle the romance Anne ended at the persuasion of Lady Russell, who judged the Captain unworthy of the family in Persuasion. Don’t tell me. I want to see if I’ve guessed it. This is number four of the Austen novels I’ve read this year.

He’s a MacArthur Fellow, has won numerous national awards, I love his writing, and he is from the city where i live. And now, Hanif Abdurraqib adds to all this the honor of being named the 2026 ABA Indie Bookstore Ambassador! Well done!

Next Week’s Reviews

Monday: Kathy Tuan-Maclean and Tara Edelschick, Moms on the Way

Tuesday: Donnie Berry, The Earth Will Be Filled

Wednesday: Ken Waters, Words That Shape Us

Thursday: Allen Levi, Theo of Golden

Friday: Jane Austen, Persuasion

So, that’s The Weekly Wrap for July 12-18.

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.

Review: The Knocker on Death’s Door

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "The Knocker on Death's Door" by Ellis Peters

The Knocker on Death’s Door

The Knocker on Death’s Door (The Felse Investigations, 10), Ellis Peters. Mysterious Press (ISBN: 9781504027151) 2015, first published in 1970.

Summary: Felse investigates two assaults, one a murder, by a church door that has a legend associated with its knocker.

What is it about that door? Legend had it that the knocker on the newly restored parish door was dangerous to sinners, whose hands could be burned if they touch it. But shortly after the celebration of its restoration, two men are assaulted. One of them, Gary Bracewell, was a freelance writer who had returned to the village to look at the door and its knocker. He was found dead at the base of the door, a hand reaching toward the knocker. A blow to the head killed him. A similar blow concussed the other victim.

Inspector Felse, a friend of Sgt. Moon, the local officer in charge, is in the area and joins the investigation. We learn that the door came from a decaying old house, part of a former abbey. The remnants of the Macsen-Martel family live there. Robert, the elder son, manages the home and cares for his ailing mother. However, Hugh, the younger, lives elsewhere and is a business partner with Dave at an automotive shop. Hugh races cars and is dating Dave’s sister Dinah. Robert discovered that the door, used for their wine cellar, had come from the parish church and arranged for the restoration.

The mystery deepens when Dave, who had repaired the steering on Bracewell’s car returns it to his widow. Because he was curious why Bracewell came back to the door, he learned that Bracewell had first seen the door when he wrote a story on the Macsen-Martel house. But the widow could share no reason for the interest. But he had search through photographs. So Dave searches out the photographer, Alix, and eventually they figure out the reason for Bracewell’s interest in the door and its knocker.

They pass all this on to Felse, which leads to the discovery of another body, accompanied by a suitcase! Felse methodically puts the pieces together just in time to prevent one more murder in the exciting climax to the story.

Ellis Peters (a.k.a. Edith Mary Pargeter) is probably most famous as the author of The Chronicles of Brother Cadfael. I read the whole series, enjoying characters, plotting, and good writing. Now I discover this series, albeit out of order, which didn’t seem to be a problem. I suspect you’ll see more reviews featuring Inspector Felse in the future! (And one spoiler: Dave and Alix get together, a trademark, it seems of an Ellis Peters story.)

Review: We the People

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image of "We the People" by Jill Lepore

We the People

We the People, Jill Lepore. Liveright (ISBN: 9781631496080) 2025.

Summary: A history of the Constitution, focusing on the amendments and how difficult it has been to amend the constitution.

Do you know what amendment took the longest time to ratify? It was the most recent, the 27th Amendment, concerning congressional pay, which took 203 years to ratify, finally in 1992. Do you know the last amendment to be proposed and ratified in modern times? It was the 26th Amendment, which was ratified in 1971, giving eighteen-year-olds the right to vote, just in time for me to vote when I turned 18! Depending on how you count, it has been 34 or 55 years since the last amendment proposed was ratified. It’s not for lack of trying, as historian Jill Lepore observes in this book. Notably the Equal Rights Amendment, broadly favored by Americans never was ratified by enough states. Although a majority would like to see this, no amendment has passed out of Congress to abolish the electoral college.

We the People is a constitutional history which focuses the history of constitutional amendments of which there have been only twenty-seven in our 250 year history. But why so few? It all comes down to Article V of the constitution. First, two thirds of both houses of congress must approve an amendment. Then either legislatures or special conventions of three-fourths of the states must ratify the amendment.

Lepore observes that amendments tend to come in clusters. The first twelve were between 1791 (the Bill of Rights, numbers One to Ten) and 1804. The next amendments, Thirteen to Fifteen, followed the Civil War, between 1865 and 1870. Then Sixteen to Twenty-One, which included Prohibition and its repeal, income tax, and women’s suffrage dated between 1913 and 1933. Finally, the most recent group came between 1951 and 1971, Amendments Twenty-Two to Twenty-Six, addressing presidential term limits, DC electors, eliminating poll taxes, presidential succession, and voting for 18-year-olds. Then there was that oddball, the 27th, on congressional pay raises, resurrected from 1789 and finally ratified in 1992.

Lepore traces the periods of amendment and the intervening periods of quiescence. Of particular interest is the growing significance of the Supreme Court, at various times treating the constitution as a living document, adapting it to changing cultural needs. Then at other times, especially more recently, originalism treats the constitution as “dead, dead, dead” in Justice Scalia’s words. All the court may do is interpret and apply it original meaning. Everything else must be addressed by Article V.

But how are amendments possible in such a polarized congress and society? And what happens when neither amendments nor court interpretations address emerging societal realities? Lepore expresses concern about the possibilities of unrest as well as moves away from constitutional democratic governance. She sees neither an activist or originalist court as the answer but a return to a more robust embrace of amendments as the needed “safety valve” that properly allows for constitutional rule that grows with the needs of the country.

She concludes:

“No constitution can be kept forever, like a butterfly under glass, tacked down with pins. In danger of wilting. To constitute is to become or establish; to amend is to mend, correct, repair, and improve. Americans might learn again to amend, or else they could invent a new instrument to guarantee liberty, promote equality, nurture families, knit communities, thwart tyranny, and avert the destruction of a habitable earth” (p. 581).

Lepore has done a tremendous work of historiography. She also has left us with good questions. But I have a hard time seeing a way forward in our current political context and that concerns me. Attempting to draft a new constitution scares me more, the implication of “invent a new instrument.” Some of the basic premises about human nature and political philosophy that the original drafters shared are no longer shared. I cannot foresee anything but chaos ensuing. It seems to me that a critical beginning is a renewed sense of shared congressional vision, leadership, and collaboration. But will we awaken to that necessity?

Review: Enacting Atonement

/ rtrube54 / 2 Comments
Cover image of "Enacting Atonement by Roy McDaniel

Enacting Atonement

Enacting Atonement (Studies in Christian Doctrine and Scripture), Roy McDaniel. IVP Academic (ISBN: 9781514012529) 2025.

Summary: A study of the burnt offering of Leviticus 1:1-9 and how it displays the logic of atonement fulfilled in Christ.

Leviticus is where Bible reading programs often go to die. We get through Genesis and Exodus (although those tabernacle instructions can be a challenge). And then we get to Leviticus. All those offerings. But Roy McDaniel believes that the burnt offering described in the first nine verses of Leviticus 1 is significant for how it enacts atonement. He believes it both points toward and finds its efficacy in Christ’s atoning death.

McDaniel unpacks his argument through a narrative analysis of Leviticus 1:1-9. He begins with the setting (chapter one) of the sacrifice in God’s call to Moses from the tent of meeting. Then he sets that call in the character of God as revealed in his dealings with Israel in Genesis and Exodus. This points to the sacrifice addressing both satisfaction of divine justice and a recapitulation through a “filial” substitution. This is further elaborated in the plot (chapter two) of the Levitical sacrifice. The plotline of the sacrifice is a return to God of the filial offeror, through the death of the sacrifice, to God.

The hero (chapter three) is the filial son who presents the offering, laying his hand on the head, then slaughtering it, and skinning it. But the priests splash its blood and arrange the pieces to be burnt. So, this points toward the eternal Son who is both offeror and offering. Earthly son can only identify with the offering. The heavenly Son becomes it. Thus, the action (chapter four) sees the offering as one addressing the offeror’s original sin that stands in the way of approaching God’s presence and serving. Daniel traces each step and how it both satisfies the justice of god through the substitution of the offering. This is completed, then, in the pleasing aroma ascending to God.

Finally, McDaniel considers the meaning (chapter 5), considering on the basis of Hebrews, how the burnt offering enacts Christ’s work. McDaniel argues for the importance of the ascension, as well as the crucifixion and resurrection. The ascension is the pleasing odor rising to God. If not the completion of the sacrifice, as Moffitt argues, it is the exaltation of the filial Son.

Since McDaniel’s case foregrounds the burnt offering of Leviticus 1 as satisfaction through filial substitution, he includes an appendix traces the histories of models of the atonement. The study makes a good case for the typological significance of the burnt offering. And it celebrates the ultimate hero, the eternal Son!

_____________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.