Review: Enabling Grace

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Enabling Grace" by Susan Mathew

Enabling Grace

Enabling Grace, Susan Mathew. Langham Global Library (ISBN: 9781839732782) 2025.

Summary: A disability reading of Paul’s letters focusing on 2 Corinthians 12:7b–10, asserting the grace of God amidst human weakness.

In recent years the church has begun to recognize the importance of welcoming and supporting those with disabilities. In the U.S., it is estimated that 28.7 percent of our people have some form of disability. The reality is that that at some point in our lives, most of us will have some form of disability. In all our communities, this group represents a significant part of our mission field.

Much of the writing has focused on what churches can do to accommodate persons with disabilities. Increasing thought is also being given to how we support families of those with disabilities. For most of us, when asked for the biblical grounds for such work, we might appeal to both the Great Commandments to love God and neighbor and the Great Commission to make disciples of all the nations and those within them.

But how does God regard, and how ought we regard those with disabilities? Dr. Susan Mathew is uniquely equipped to address these questions. She not only has a doctorate in biblical studies and teaches New Testament at Faith Theological Seminary in Kerala, India. She is the parent of a son, Jyothish, with cerebral palsy. As she sought to address the needs of her son, she recognized many other families in Kerala with children with special needs. This led to founding the Deepti Special School and Rehabilitation Centre, which she directs. Thus, she combines biblical scholarship and extensive personal experience in this book.

Her focus is on select letters of the Apostle Paul, his use of the language of weakness including his “thorn in the flesh.” She considers how God works in human weakness and how the body of Christ may honor its weakest members. Mathew begins by addressing definitions and models of disability. She also identifies the passage in 1 and 2 Corinthians she will discuss. She lists the words used, with a focus on asthenia or “weakness.” Before turning to more detailed examination of relevant passages, she discusses disability in antiquity. Sadly, the fate of infants with disability was abandonment and death. In Judaism, disabilities excluded people from temple service. Many viewed disabilities as the result of sin or God’s curse.

Then chapter three considers God’s choice of the weak and foolish, described in 1 Corinthians 1:18-2:7. God works through the ultimate expression of weakness, the foolishness of the cross to subvert society’s norms and worldly wisdom. God identifies with and choose the weak as objects of his grace. Chapter four then turns to Paul’s teaching on gifts and the interdependence of the body of Christ. Among the gifted are those with disabilities, revealing God’s power working through human weakness. This calls for mutual concern and the honor of the less honorable. Above and over all is the love of 1 Corinthians 13. Chapter four also deals with 1 Corinthians 15 and the resurrection of the body. In this is both continuity and discontinuity, most notably, the transformation of all weakness and disability.

But what hope is there for the suffering and affliction caused by disabilities in this life? Chapter five turns to this question, looking at 2 Corinthians 1:3-10 and 12:7-10. Mathew considers the role of patient endurance, our partnership in suffering, and the comfort we have in Christ. Then she turns to an in depth study of Paul’s “thorn in the flesh.” She explores what this may have been, Paul’s prayer and how Christ met him in weakness.

The final chapters unpack all this. Chapter 6 recounts the author’s personal story and her experience of God’s power in her Christian community. In the final chapter, she explores what a holistic theology of grace means in the context of disability, including how Paul’s disability deepened his understanding of enabling grace.

This book is a good beginning toward a theology of disability. Coupled with the author’s personal testimony, it speaks powerfully of God’s enabling grace for persons with disabilities. And it calls us to be communities of mutual care and interdependence, recognizing the grace and gifts of God on those with disabilities.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: The Joy of Solitude

/ rtrube54 / 1 Comment
Cover image of "The Joy of Solitude" by Robert J. Coplan

The Joy of Solitude

The Joy of Solitude, Robert J. Coplan. Simon & Schuster (ISBN: 9781668053423) 2025.

Summary: A study of the complexities of solitude and how it can enrich our lives and relationships.

I’ve read a number of books discussing solitude from a spiritual perspective. But this is the first from a secular perspective. Robert J. Coplan is a psychologist who has been studying solitude for thirty years. It all began when he was observing children at play and the different ways they reacted to playing alone. He was curious why some were content to do so, while welcoming others to join them but others were more uneasy about this.

That’s an example of how solitude can mean different things for different people. And it’s not always something we like. In one experiment students were asked to spend fifteen minutes alone in a room. They also had the option to self-administer painful electric shocks. For the majority, sitting alone with one’s thoughts was more aversive than the electric shocks!

But what is solitude? Is it physical separation from others? Does this include animals? Can one experience solitude on a crowded commuter train? Or walking through an art gallery? Turns out all of those can be forms of solitude, So why does solitude get a bad rap? Often, it is because it is rightly believed that it is good for us to be with others and not alone. And extended solitude, especially in childhood can be bad for social development. Forced solitude from ostracism or isolation, leading to loneliness has all kinds of negative impacts. We don’t want that!

But there are times we do want to be away from people. And it seems the key difference between good and bad solitude is in whether we want it. Solitude offers a sense of freedom. Research has also shown that time in natural environments makes us feel calmer, happier, less anxious. A key element is the deactivation of emotions and the fostering of attention. Perhaps that’s why solitude has benefits of both creativity and connectedness. Not only that, there is a “goldilocks factor.” We each have a “just right.”

There is a balance between solitude and socializing, unique for each of us. But the quality of both is important. Alone time just spent ruminating as opposed to engaging in activities like hobbies, reading, or being outside. Temperament also matters. Introverts welcome solitude to a greater degree but introversion is about more than solitude. On the other hand, introverts also under-estimate how short social interactions can positively affect them.

Coplan then gets into how we can do solitude better. Our attitude is important. Those who understand the benefits have a more positive experience. Sometimes, it even helps to “fake it until you make it.” He encourages a journal to track our time to notice what is most helpful. There is no one right way. Like exercising, starting with small doses and building up can help. Even just fifteen minutes can make a difference in our sense of well-being. And avoid ruminating!

He also explores how solitude helps creativity by letting our minds wander. When working on a problem, taking a break and switching helps incubate new ideas. Solitude also allows us to achieve a state of “flow.” Like many others, he advocates solitude from our devices. He invites us to cultivate “JOMO,” the Joy Of Missing Out. At least we should turn off notifications, and avoid scrolling through newsfeeds.

He offers advice on solitude and children. For younger children building solitude muscles by choosing how they’ll spend time alone (but not on screens) can benefit them. Older children, on the other hand, may have so many schedule demands that they need help carving out alone time. And parents also need alone time (and can model this!). And alone time can enhance time together, including for couples.

I found the discussion distinguishing good and bad solitude and the diverse activities that one may pursue in solitude to be helpful. There were so many helpful, practical ideas for finding the right mix of solitude and socializing for each person with lots of permission to experiment. I loved the suggestions for creativity.

I mentioned the practice of solitude as a spiritual practice. While the book takes a secular, mental health approach to this, I think a non-sectarian discussion of solitude and spirituality might have enriched this book, since this is a place where many are introduced to solitude, often with helpful direction.

That said, this is a helpful introduction to the benefits of solitude, and the opportunity to become one’s own best friend.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Knowing Christ Today

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Knowing Christ Today" by Dallas Willard

Knowing Christ Today

Knowing Christ Today, Dallas Willard. Harper Collins (ISBN: 9780062311795) 2014 (first published in 2009).

Summary: Why the knowledge of Christ is real knowledge of true things on which one may base one’s life and confidently speak.

I’ve encountered it. Statements like “God exists,” Christ died to save us,” Christ is risen” and many others are treated quite differently from E=MC2. We treat the former as opinions or sentiments whereas we treat the latter as a statement of fact. We relegate the former to the category of “faith” whereas the latter is “knowledge.”

In this book Dallas Willard argues to the contrary, that Christian belief is equally a form of knowledge, accurately representing reality, based upon evidence. We may act upon this knowledge. Faith is not “blind” but acting upon the known. Not only that, Willard goes on to argue that this is indispensable knowledge, without which we perish into some form of idolatry, as Willard points out in contrasting other worldviews to Christian belief. Furthermore, Willard goes on to argue that the rejection of Christian knowledge has been accompanied by the disappearance of moral knowledge

But how does Willard make the case for Christian belief as true knowledge? In chapter four, he puts forth a form of the cosmological argument for the existence of a creator. He then puts forth a case for God’s activity in the world, including his active intervention in miracles culminating in the resurrection of Jesus.

But how does one live out the knowledge of Christ? Chapter 6 pulls together strands from other works on entering the kingdom with humble obedience and the practice of spiritual disciplines in community. The concluding chapter 8 discusses the role of preachers, calling them to base their preaching upon this knowledge.

However, Christians have often come off as arrogant know-it-alls? How is the assertion of Christian faith as true knowledge to avoid this in a religiously pluralistic world? First of all, he asks whether believing oneself right about something and others wrong is inherently arrogant? Or is it possible to be humble and loving about our disagreements? Then he recognizes the value of a “weak” pluralism that affirms the good wherever we find it. Yet no true believer would say it makes no difference what one believes. However, there is the troubling question of the fate of those who never hear the gospel. While affirming that salvation is always by grace and through Christ, he joins Billy Graham in affirming that these are decisions only God will make.

This work is important for Christians who feel faith is relegated to the personal and private. It helps them understand both how this has come about and why its wrong. Without extensive excursions into epistemology or apologetics, it outlines why Christian belief is real knowledge. However this reveals a shortcoming of the work. It makes arguments without dealing with why many have challenged them. But that would require a much longer book. That said, this work helps restore a humble confidence in believing and proclaiming Christ.

The Weekly Wrap: April 5-11

/ rtrube54 / 3 Comments
woman in white crew neck t shirt sitting on chair
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

The Weekly Wrap: April 5-11

They Made It Too Well

I was among many Kindle users who received this email, which I will quote in part, from Amazon:

Dear Customer,

Thank you for being a longtime Kindle customer. We’re glad our devices have served you well for as long as they have. Starting May 20, 2026 — 14 to 18 years after their initial launches — we are discontinuing support for Kindle devices released in 2012 or earlier. Here’s what this means for you:

* You can continue to read books already downloaded on these devices, but you will not be able to purchase, borrow, or download additional books on them after that date.
* If you deregister or factory reset these devices, you will not be able to re-register or use these devices in any way.

Affected devices include Kindle 1st and 2nd Generation, Kindle DX and DX Graphite, Kindle Keyboard, Kindle 4, Kindle Touch, Kindle 5, and Kindle Paperwhite 1st Generation.

I have used a Kindle Keyboard to read e-books. It was registered January 30, 2012. I like it for mysteries, science fiction, and other books I’m not interested in putting on physical shelves. I’ve read hundreds of books and have hundreds more stored on it. Most important of all, it works! It’s lasted longer than any other electronic device I’ve used. If nothing else, whoever manufactured it for Amazon built it well. So well, in fact, that I planned to keep using it until it died. I love the low glare screen and the ability to set font sizes.

Well, it appears I can still use it until it dies or as long as I don’t de-register it. But after next month, I won’t be able to download new books. No one with a pre-2013 Kindle will be able to do that.

I’ve heard a lot of us old Kindle users are furious. I’m not happy about it. Amazon’s solution, unless you use the Amazon app on other devices, is to buy a new Kindle e-reader, the base cost for which is $109. To ease the pain, they are offering a 20 percent discount and a $20 credit on e-books.

I haven’t made up my mind on what to do. I’m not crazy about Amazon in general. It seems to me this is a great time for other e-book platforms to lure new customers. I might just jump ship if a competitor offers a good deal (hint, hint!). Want to know more about what’s behind Amazon’s email? Here’s a good article I found.

Five Articles Worth Reading

Many of us have had notions of reading “the Great Books.” Ted Gioia has created a 52-week humanities program. In “How to Read the Great Books in 52 Weeks,” he’s interviewed by one of his readers who completed the course.

Are you troubled by the world we are leaving to our children and grand-children? I am. But how are the children doing with that? Tae Keller’s new children’s novel, When Tomorrow Burns, explores through the eyes of three seventh graders the question “What do you do when your biggest fear comes true?” Craig Morgan Teicher reviews this new book in “Kids: It’s Not All on You to Save the World.”

Rebecca Ackerman argues for human ghostwriters as “The Literary Job AI Can’t Replace.”

It inspired Ray Bradbury. And it launched the careers of many science fiction writers. In “How Amazing Stories Served as the Blueprint for American Science Fiction,” Ed Simon chronicles the history of this pulp publication.

So, it must be Ed Simon week! In a different publication, he explores the influence of Francis Bacon on the scientific research enterprise on the quadricentenary of his death. “The Man Who Invented the Future” explores the complicated legacy of his 1620 Novum Organum.

Quote of the Week

Irish poet George William Russell was born April 10, 1867. He offers this counsel for anyone engaged in some form of “resistance” or activism:

“We may fight against what is wrong, but if we allow ourselves to hate, that is to insure our spiritual defeat and our likeness to what we hate.”

Miscellaneous Musings

I received an unusual gift yesterday. She Teaches Me Still is a memoir of Phyllis Strong LePeau, who died in 2022. It is written by her husband, Andrew T. LePeau. Phyllis was one of the most joyful and caring people I ever knew. I look forward to reading this account…and remembering.

I am thoroughly enjoying Frank Deford’s dual biography of Christy Mathewson and John McGraw, The Old Ball Game. Their time together with the New York Giants transformed baseball as one of the greatest pitchers and greatest managers, respectively.

I’m reading Tom Holland’s Dominion, subtitled “How the Christian Revolution Remade the World.” Others have raved about this book. So far, I’m less than impressed, making me wonder what I’m not getting.

Next Week’s Reviews

Monday: Dallas Willard, Knowing Christ Today

Tuesday: Robert J. Coplan, The Joy of Solitude

Wednesday: Susan Mathew, Enabling Grace

Thursday: Marietje Schaake, The Tech Coup

Friday: Frank Deford, The Old Ball Game

So, that’s The Weekly Wrap  for April 5-11.

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.

Review: Stones Still Speak

/ rtrube54 / 2 Comments
Cover image of "Stones Still Speak" by Amanda Hope Haley

Stones Still Speak

Stones Still Speak, Amanda Hope Hailey. Revell (ISBN: 9780800746483) 2025.

Summary: Shows how biblical archaeology helps us understand the context of scripture, sometimes correcting misunderstandings.

Amanda Hope Hailey is a Harvard-trained archaeologist, speaking and writing as The Red-Haired Archaeologist. The focus of her work is to show how archaeological research helps us understand the context of the Bible. She does not treat biblical archaeology as a form of apologetics, providing confirmations of the truth of the Bible or of Christianity. In fact, she honestly admits where archaeology is unable to confirm things in the Bible, including the lack of evidence for Israel’s first three kings. For her, that doesn’t cast doubt on the biblical accounts. She writes: “Holy Scripture is God-breathed. It does not require or even request that humans dig into our planet’s crust to find physical evidence of its truths. It is Truth.” She also shows how what we have learned in archaeology sometimes corrects misunderstandings of Bible stories we learned in Sunday School.

After introducing the work of biblical archaeology, she walks through a number of familiar biblical accounts. For each, she offers background and context, often drawing on archaeology, but not always. She begins with the creation accounts discussing why there are two different accounts, as well as discussing key words like “day.” Her observation is that there was no editing or blending of the two accounts. She explores the various efforts to discover Noah’s ark and makes the common sense observation that after the flood, the ark probably provided building materials, since these would have been scarce. She sets Abraham in the Middle Bronze Age, discusses his sons, his travels, and his tomb.

When it comes to Joseph, she set him in the context of the Pharaohs as well as the invasion of the Hyksos, which set a precedent for foreign rulers. We also learn that a better translation for Joseph’s coat might be “long-sleeved” rather than “many-colored,” an artifact of the Septuagint translation. Haley considers possible explanations for Moses miracles, including the parting of the sea. She’s honest in saying we have no evidence, despite the proposed explanations.

When it comes to David and Goliath, many of our tellings exaggerate both Goliath’s size and David’s smallness. If he wrestled beasts in tending sheep, he was likely a full-grown adult. Likewise, Goliath probably was about seven feet–tall but not giant. Finally, slings were a potent weapon that could fling a stone at 150 miles per hour. Haley emphasizes how God had prepared David for this encounter. Considering the absence of evidence for Solomon, despite his greatness, she suggests his disobedience contributed to the disappearance of his name.

Then there is Jonah. While we have no clue what swallowed him beyond the “great fish” of scripture, we do know a lot about the Assyrian civilization and the city to which he went. She raises the intriguing question of what might have happened had Jonah preached more than his minimalist message. Likewise, we have no clue what happened to the ark of the covenant, other than it was carried off, “plundered” according to a deuterocanonical text. It’s not in an army warehouse! Haley also fills in the important history of the so-called “silent years.”

Finally, she touches more briefly on the New Testament. As have others, she observes the word translated “inn” more likely meant an upstairs bedroom used for guests. Instead, Joseph and Mary found shelter in a first floor living area, also used for the family’s animals. She discusses the sites of Jesus ministry and death.

What Haley emphasizes is how important contexts (and sometimes good translations) are to understanding the Bible. She offers a wealth of this in the text and sidebars throughout the book. However, I was surprised, and perhaps disappointed that there was not more archaeology. There are no images or diagrams. Given the title and subtitle, I was expecting more of that. But she does model how archaeology interacts with our study of scripture and other texts helping us understand context. And this is a good model for beginning students of scripture.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Vigil

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Vigil" by George Saunders

Vigil

Vigil, George Saunders. Random House (ISBN: 9780525509622) 2026.

Summary: Jill Blaine is a spirit who consoles the dying but her current charge needs no consoling, leading her to reexamine her short life.

She’s descending to earth, her body and clothing reconstituted as she falls. “She” is Jill “Doll” Blaine, an “elevated” spirit whose task is to console the dying in their last hours, helping them to come to terms with their regrets, fears, the unfinished. She’s done this 343 times.

But K. J. Boone is different. Lying in his bed in his stately Texas mansion, he doesn’t think he needs consolation. As she searches his thoughts she found “a formidable stubbornness. A steady flow of satisfaction, even triumph, coursed through him, regarding all he had managed to do, see, cause, and create, especially given his humble origins.” And she found no doubts, even as he lay dying of cancer.

Boone was an oil tycoon who rose from working on rigs to leading one of the largest oil companies. At the height of his powers, he gave a speech “debunking” the science of global warming that became a standard reference for deniers. He was a fierce defender of his industry, and all that it had made possible.

But she was not to be left alone with him. Other “spirits” attempt to show him the error of his ways. The Frenchman who invented the internal combustion engine. People who suffered the effects of climate change. And many more from his past. None shake his self-justifications. But many try to make him accountable.

But this shakes her. She recalls how she died as a newlywed. She was blown up by a car bomb meant for her husband. So, she leaves her charge to revisit her Indiana hometown. She enters the mind of the man who planted the bomb. Like Boone, he had no regrets. He considered it an inevitability.

Accountability versus inevitability. Jill wrestles with what that meant in her short life, and what that means for dealing with her charge and the parade of spirits besieging him as his life wanes away. In other words, was it right to assist the spirits trying to wrangle a deathbed turn-of-heart out of him? Conversely, was there a kind of inevitability to the trajectory of his life, one that justified his self-satisfaction? That is to say, did he simply fulfill a predestined course?

These are unsettling questions–the kind that leave you thinking when you’ve put the book aside for other things. Some want Boone to be responsible for the terrible things he unleashed, although Boone pokes at the pretensions of those fueling their environmental activism with his oil. However we think of these things, we think choices matter and want people to be responsible. Yet are not people a part of things larger than themselves that shape them?

It’s a question Christian theologians have wrestled with for two millenia. Are human beings responsible? Yes. Is God sovereign and does God predestine? Yes. I have not met anyone who has satisfactorily explained how both can be so. Yet both things somehow have a ring of truth, explaining something of the way the world is, kind of like light as both a particle and a wave.

And that is what Saunders would have us wrestle with. Is life complicated enough that we must live with the tension? But it seems that all Saunders would afford the dying is comfort for lives they cannot change. However, what if there were the possibility of grace?

Review: Not Quite Kosher

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Not Quite Kosher by Stuart M. Kaminsky

Not Quite Kosher

Not Quite Kosher (Abe Lieberman, 7), Stuart M. Kaminsky. Forge Books (ISBN: 9781429912631) 2002

Summary: Lieberman juggles two murder cases, one with multiple deaths including a cop, a bar mitzvah, a partner’s wedding and more.

Sometimes a lot of life happens at once. At home, Lieberman is involved in bar mitzvah plans for his grandson, mainly in figuring out how to stretch the family budget to pay for everything and leave something to repair the roof. Meanwhile, his partner Hanrahan is moving up his wedding date to marry Iris Chin–to this week, with a reception at the Liebermans! This, despite Iris’s family disapproval and threats which Lieberman cleverly handles through the leader of one of Chicago’s gangs. And he even manages to book Senator Joe Lieberman (no relation) to speak for a synagogue fund-raiser.

Then there is the work. A group of young thugs attacks a depressed store owner. Only it doesn’t turn out so well. The man, Arnold Sokol, defends himself well enough to chase two of the young men off and land the other in the hospital. Lieberman and his rabbi help settle things with the young man in the hospital, or so they think. But the next day, Sokol’s badly beaten body washes up in the lake.

Actually, that’s just one of two bodies that wash up. The other is a man called Pryor, involved in Lieberman’s other case. Him and Michael Wychovski rob a jewelry store–the same one they robbed a year ago. Only this time, things don’t turn out so well. On the way out, Pryor stumbles and his gun goes off, killing the owner. Then, while Wychovski drives, he fires on pursuing police, killing one of them. But they manage to elude capture-until Pryor’s body washes up along with Sokol’s.

I love the great relationship between Lieberman and Hanrahan, punctuated with food stops and ever-present reminders about Lieberman’s cholesterol. Each has gotten the other out of trouble on more than one occasion. I also love the philosophic decency of Lieberman–his companionable marriage, his acceptance of his difficult daughter, and his loyalty to his brother Maish and the alter cockers. He’s a man people trust, from Kearney, his boss to a somewhat unstable gang leader.

The reader trusts him as well, even to catching the real killer of Arnold Sokol. My only regret is that Kaminsky only wrote ten installments in this series. Having read most of the Rostnikov and Lieberman stories, perhaps it’s time to check out Toby Peters and Lew Fonseca, his two other crime solvers.

Review: Naming the Spirit

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Naming the Spirit" by W. David O. Taylor and Daniel Train, eds.

Naming the Spirit

Naming the Spirit, W. David O. Taylor and Daniel Train, eds. IVP Academic (ISBN: 9781514013489) 2025.

Summary: An essay collection considering the different names for the Holy Spirit, using works of art to deepen our understanding.

Many of us wrestle to understand the person and work of the Holy Spirit. While scripture is always our ultimate authority, artistic works often illuminate the narratives of scripture. They depict in image and sound the character and work of God in the world. This book focuses in on the Holy Spirit, looking at names and aspects of the work of the Spirit from both theological and artistic perspectives. The essays are authored by both theologians and artists, some co-written.

Steve Guthrie open the collection considering the Greek term for Spirit, pneuma, which can mean “wind” or “breath.” He reflects on the poetic “fecundity” of this term. It speaks to God’s life-giving breath, his word-bearing breath, and the dynamic wind of God. Then Jonathan A. Anderson uses portrayals of Pentecost in early church art. Thus, he considers the spaciality of “descent,” the visual form of this outpouring in tongues and fire, the persons on whom the Spirit is poured,- and from where this outpouring occurs. Christina Carnes Ananias explores how Olafur Eliasson’s Beauty illustrates Basil’s contention that light and the image it illuminates cannot be separated.

Several collaborative essays follow. Erin Shaw and Taylor Worley reflect on the shalom of the Spirit. Shaw’s art is influenced by Native American ideas and worldview. She draws on the notion of kincentricity as an expression of what shalom means–the interdependency of all things flourishing in relationships of reciprocity. From discs of various sizes to wound balls of string, she expresses this idea. Then Devon Abts and Joelle Hathaway return to the idea of pneuma, connecting our breath and the breath of the Spirit. They do so through an analysis of Ross Gay’s “A Small Needful Fact,” written upon the death of Eric Garner whose last cry was “I can’t breathe.”

Finally, Phil Allen Jr. and Justin Ariel Bailey move from breath to breadth. They consider the work of the Spirit in creating habitable spaces for people through Dea Jenkins BLK Halos, an artistic installation for artistic resistance and liturgical performance in a black-walled room with textile creations. Then, perhaps the greatest example of creating a “habitable space” came when the Spirit “overshadowed” Mary. Chelle Stearns explores Oliver Messiaen’s Vingt Regards sur l’Enfant-Jesus. She reflects on how Messiaen captures the work of the Spirit in Mary, with her full assent, and how the Spirit may similarly work in the church.

Julian Davis Reid describes the Spirit’s prompting during a performance to enfold “Holy, Holy, Holy” into “Give Me Jesus” as a lead in to exploring the Spirit’s convicting work. Amy Whisenand Krall also draws on a musical performance. “Hope for Resolution” serves as the basis to reflect on maintaining the unity of the Spirit. Having sung this piece, it joins an ancient chant and an African praise song into a seamless garment of sound. Finally, in this section on music, Shannon Steed Sigler considers Charles Wesley’s “resignation,” and both the spiritual and creative freedom that followed.

Lastly, the concluding two essays turn to film and landscape architecture. David W. McNutt and Wesley Vander Lugt consider Terence Malik’s The Tree of Life. They focus on its insights into the comforting and disrupting work of the Spirit. Jennifer A. Craft and W. David O. Taylor describe the renovation of Laity Lodge’s landscape, using native species requiring less maintenance. They see this as an illustration of the Spirit’s particularizing work. No one size fits all!

Part of the impact of a book like this is to be able to experience the artistic works. The book renders some of these and links to others. The chapter on maintaining the unity of the Spirit was powerful because I’ve sung “Hope for Resolution” and knew its significance. The person and work of the Holy Spirit is not known merely through cognition or affect. The Spirit acts upon our physical world. People know Him through their senses and in their bodies. So, this collaboration of theologians and artists helps open up the reader to that deeper knowing.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

Review: Matthew

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
Cover image of "Matthew" by Darrell L Bock and Timothy D. Sprankle

Matthew

Matthew (Kerux Commentaries), Darrell L. Bock and Timothy D. Sprankle. Kregel Ministry (ISBN: 9780825458255) 2025.

Summary: A Kerux Commentary combining exegesis of Matthew with communication insights for teaching and preaching.

The Kerux Commentary series is designed for pastors and teachers. First, an accomplished exegetical scholar unpacks the literary structure and theme of a text, offering a brief expository overview, verse-by verse discussion of the text, and a theological summary of the text. Then, a skilled preacher focuses in on a “Big Idea” from the exegesis, offers contemporary connections and creative ideas for presentation. This part concludes with a succinct preaching outline and discussion questions. In the case of this volume, New Testament scholar Darrell L. Bock (Dallas Theological Seminary) combines with Timothy D. Sprankle, senior pastor at Leesburg Grace Brethren Church in Northern Indiana.

Like most commentaries, this offers an introductory section. Reflecting its conservative character, it favors Matthean authorship, written for an audience of churches near Judea, and a date prior to the fall of the temple. It notes the prophetic claims of Matthew, which the commentary traces, suggesting an apologetic purpose. Unlike proposals that Matthew draws on Mark and is the source for Luke, this commentary accepts the more traditional proposal of Matthew’s dependence on Mark, a shared source with Luke (some form of the hypothetical Q?) and unique materials to which Matthew had access.

A few highlights from this lengthy commentary. The birth narrative (2:1-23) recognizes God’s providential leading and protection. The temptation passage (4:1-11) highlights Israel’s wilderness history and Jesus qualification to reverse Adam’s sin. Within the Sermon on the Mount, the discussion of 5:21-48 highlights the love that goes beyond the law, that righteousness is about more than being right. The commentary on 8:1-9:38 highlights the three triads of miracles and how they reveal his authority and call for a choice.

Then, as opposition intensifies, Jesus turns to parables (13:1-58). Specifically, disciples are distinguished as those who listen, discovering the power and preciousness of the kingdom. However, opposition continues to intensify as Jesus extends God’s compassion in 15:1-16:12. Then, I appreciated particularly the contrast drawn in the commentary on 19:3-30 between the humility of children and the obstacles wealth create to knowing God.

Finally, we turn to the Passion narratives in Matthew. I loved how the authors connected the healing of the blind in Jericho with the Triumphal entry (20:29-21:11). The commentary shows the intensifying opposition, how Jesus met every challenge. The commentary on the Olivet Discourse (24:1-25:46) both reflects and an awareness of Matthew’s original audience, and the contemporary need to be watchful and about the work of the kingdom. The trial and death narratives focus on Jesus innocence and messianic identity.

The exegetical commentary emphasizes readability over extended discussions of minutiae with lots of Greek text and footnotes. Yet, the engagement with scholarship shows in references to other scholars and the concluding bibliography. Also, sidebars on other Jewish sources relating to a particular text offer good background. However, I found the preaching material less helpful. Although it suggests helpful directions in contemporary application of the text, I thought it could become a substitute for prayer for reflection and exegesis of one’s congregation or audience. Nevertheless, the suggestions of visual media and other creative actions helpful in breaking out of preaching ruts.

In sum, I think many pastors will find this a solid and accessible resource for study, preaching and teaching.

_______________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.

The Weekly Wrap: March 29-April 4

/ rtrube54 / Leave a comment
woman in white crew neck t shirt sitting on chair
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

The Weekly Wrap: March 29-April 4

First Authors, Now Reviewers!

Last week, I wrote about Mia Ballard’s book being pulled by Hachette when it was found to rely heavily on AI. This week, a story broke about New York Times free lance reviewer Alex Preston’s use of AI in a review of Jean-Baptiste Andrea’s Watching Over Her. It turns out, the AI inserted passages into the review from another review of the book in The Guardian. A Times reader recognized the similarity of the reviews and contacted them.

When they confronted Preston, he admitted his use of AI in the review and acknowledged the serious mistake he’d made. The New York Times has ended its relationship with Preston and linked his review to that of Christobel Kent in the Guardian. You can read more about this incident in this Guardian story.

Preston has written other articles and books and insists he has not used AI-generated text. But like any case of plagiarism, one discovered incidents taints the whole. I expect he will have a hard time publishing anything going forward.

However, as a reviewer, I understand the temptation. Sometimes I’m tired or have to fit reviews into other obligations. I suspect professional reviewers struggle with the same temptations, with paychecks at stake. AI can speed up the writing process. Preston’s failure was not properly citing his source. Instead, he represented the AI text as his own.

I do not use AI in writing, apart from a “readability” aid integrated into WordPress software. But the content comes from my interaction with the books I’m reviewing. Afterall, readers can seek AI reviews of books if they want. But I assume those who come to this page do so to learn what I thought about the book in question. If I can’t do that, it’s time to hang it up.

Five Articles Worth Reading

Tracy Kidder died last week. In “What Tracy Kidder Stood For,” Cullen Murphy reviews his career and the impact of his writing.

July 4, 2026 is the 250th birthday of the United States. Beverly Gage, in This Land is Your Land takes us on a road trip to 300 historical sites, a kind of road trip through our history. Reviewer Jennifer Szalai considers Gage’s effort in “Road-Tripping With a Historian Through America’s Past.”

So, I find almost anything Alan Jacobs writes worth a read. And so it was with “How Not to Save the Planet.” Instead of abstractions like “saving the planet,” he argues “If you learn to love a pond or a creek or a valley, then what you love others will love—and will perhaps also come to find some element of their own local environment dear to them, dear enough to conserve and protect.”

Did you know that April is National Poetry Month. Therefore, it’s a good time to do something about that floating resolution to read more poetry! And the folks at JSTOR have compiled the grand-daddy of resources in “A Reader’s Guide to Poetry for National Poetry Month.”

Finally, I discovered a real treat in “Hear Aldous Huxley Read Brave New World. Plus 84 Classic Radio Dramas from CBS Radio Workshop (1956–57).” Not only can you hear Huxley read his famous work, the Open Culture article points you to where you can hear 84 more productions from the CBS Radio Workshop, back when you could hear quality productions around the family radio before TV supplanted it.

Quote of the Week

Jane Goodall, who died just last year, was born April 3, 1934, She made an observation that both seems simple, and perhps one of the hardest things for human beings to do consistently:

“Change happens by listening and then starting a dialogue with the people who are doing something you don’t believe is right.”

Miscellaneous Musings

I don’t know if you knew this but we lived for nine years in the eastern suburbs of Cleveland–and loved our time there. Recently, heard of a new store opening up in a cool part of Cleveland Heights, The Checkered Bookshelf. There are a number of interesting bookstores in the city. Two on my book crawl bucket list are Loganberry Books and Zubal Books. Remember when I visited John King’s in Detroit? Zubal Books looks and sounds like that.

I’ll be reviewing George Saunders’ Vigil next week. It was an engrossing read but I found the ending both disappointing and puzzling. I wonder if any other readers of this book had that reaction?

Literary Hub ran an article that had me written all over it: “What Are the Routines of So-Called Super-Readers?” I wasn’t interviewed for the article, but the five things they found that super-readers have in common ring true. So who else out there are super-readers?

Next Week’s Reviews

Monday: Darrell L. Bock and Timothy D. Sprankle, Matthew

Tuesday: W. David O. Taylor and Daniel Train, eds., Naming the Spirit

Wednesday: Stuart M. Kaminsky, Not Quite Kosher

Thursday: George Saunders, Vigil

Friday: Amanda Hope Haley, Stones Still Speak

So, that’s The Weekly Wrap  for March 29-April 4.

Find past editions of The Weekly Wrap under The Weekly Wrap heading on this page.